The first issue of The New York Times’ new book on the global economic crisis is now available.
The book, The Crash, is a detailed, devastating account of the financial crisis and the slow-moving economic recovery that followed.
The title, however, does not reflect the book’s subject.
It is a fascinating look at the economy’s decline and its aftermath.
The New Yorker has been on the forefront of reporting on the crisis, covering the rise of Wall Street, its aftermath and the rise in its popularity, while The Times has been more reserved in its coverage of what happened after the crisis.
“The Crash is a devastating book about what happened, but it’s not the same book as what happened,” said Times columnist David Brooks, who was the Times’ most influential columnist until the publication of The Times, The Economist and the Economist/Getty in December.
“It’s a more complex and nuanced book than what we typically write about, but we are committed to telling it.”
Brooks has written extensively about the global financial crisis, writing about how the crisis unfolded in depth and the lessons it has drawn for policymakers, businesses and the public.
He was part of the Times team that wrote about the crisis in its first issue.
“I was stunned that The Times was not doing anything to cover this story,” said Brooks, whose own father was a major Wall Street executive who was killed by a drunk driver in 2002.
“I felt as though they didn’t want to acknowledge it.”
The New York Post reported on the story on Tuesday.
“If The Times is going to have any credibility as a news organization, it’s going to need to make sure that its coverage is as accurate and balanced as possible,” said Andrew Prokop, a professor at the University of Chicago who has written about the financial crash.
“That means that it should have done something about this story long before the crisis even began.”
Broken promises and false starts”A great deal of the work of The Wall Street Journal has been devoted to covering the financial collapse, and I think that’s an accurate way to do it,” Brooks said.
“But the paper itself has been very reluctant to take the responsibility for covering the crash, which is something that a lot of journalists don’t want.”
Brooke and other journalists have been trying to track down the Times that it did not have to go to.
In its own words:”The New Yorker’s story of the Great American Financial Crash is the story of a great deal more than just one man and a single family.
Its a story of how an economy that was built on the promise of the stock market collapsed.”
The book comes just over two months after the publication in the Times of an account of an alleged secret meeting between President Barack Obama and the Saudi royal family, which sparked a scandal that cost Obama his re-election bid.
It was widely reported at the time, and Obama has denied any wrongdoing.